Evaluating teachers

Maintaining a lively pace Demonstrating intensity and enthusiasm Using friendly controversy

Evaluating teachers

Guidelines for Evaluating Teaching Introduction Just as there is no simple system for evaluating the quality of faculty research, there is no simple system for evaluating the quality of faculty teaching.

However, by thinking carefully about the purposes of evaluation, and by crafting multiple methods of evaluation that suit those purposes, one can devise evaluation systems that are reliable, valid, and fair.

Equally important, the process of discussing and crafting evaluation systems focuses attention on the practice of good teaching and helps to create a culture in which teaching is highly valued.

Some Principles of Teaching Evaluation Multiple methods. The most important consideration in teaching evaluation, both for improvement purposes and for personnel decisions, is the use of multiple methods of teaching evaluation involving multiple sources of data.

Faculty, departmental and school responsibilities. To ensure that the evaluation system adopted is credible and acceptable, faculty members must have a strong hand in its development. Before departments and schools adopt teaching evaluation systems, the faculty members should determine their criteria for effective teaching.

Departments and schools can then take responsibility for developing their own evaluation methods and evaluation criteria. Since different disciplines require different methods and settings for instruction, they require different methods and criteria for evaluation.

Evaluating teachers

This is also true for interdisciplinary instruction. Teaching evaluation systems can be flexible to accommodate diversity in instructional methods e. To promote compatibility within the university, standards should be reviewed, understood, and accepted by all groups involved in the promotion and tenure review process.

Which Is Best?

Effective teaching evaluation must be individualized. A uniform system discriminates against some individuals, so a plan sensitive to individual variation should be developed.

Evaluating teachers

Consideration can then be given to changes in emphasis and interest that will naturally occur in an academic career. What may be assessed.

Teaching evaluation has as its central element the assessment of the quality of classroom instruction. Since teaching includes activities broader than classroom instruction, evaluation of teaching must assess more than classroom performance. While departments and schools may identify additional items, among the teaching activities that may be assessed are the following: Some Sources of Data for Evaluating Teaching: Students, Colleagues, and Self-Reflection Students: Multiple Sources End-of-course rating forms and written comments.

Generally, students are able to report on the extent to which a teacher appears prepared for class sessions, communicates clearly, stimulates interest, and demonstrates enthusiasm and respect for students; research shows that student responses on these dimensions are valid and reliable.

Generally, students are less able to judge the knowledge of the instructor or scholarly content and currency of a course.

When using student ratings for personnel decisions and teaching improvement, institutions often include the following among their guidelines: Questions about instructors and courses should be relevant.

Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness - Education Next : Education Next

They should fit the instructors and courses being evaluated. Multiple sets of ratings of faculty courses over time should be considered; personnel decisions should be influenced only by ratings from several courses over several terms. Because global ratings of the teacher or course tend to correlate higher with student learning than do more specific items, personnel decisions should rely more on global items e.

Comparative data such as departmental, school, or institutional norms should be provided so that individual evaluations can be interpreted within a meaningful context. For example, information about course characteristics e. When results from student evaluation forms are used in personnel decisions, it is essential that standardized procedures for administering the forms be followed.

Procedures should indicate who will distribute, collect and return questionnaires; when the evaluations should take place; and when the evaluation results will be made available.

Student rating results should be considered in personnel decisions only when most of the students in a class have completed the surveys.

The use of optional items chosen by the instructor customizes and makes the forms more useful for teaching improvement purposes.

Rating forms should include open-ended questions so that students can write their own comments.

Evaluation of Teaching | CRLT

Written comments are particularly helpful in improving classroom performance.evaluating teachers. High quality professional development must be available to every teacher. Professional development programs should be based on state standards, district Even the best teacher assessment and evaluation systems are likely to fail in an education system that fails to.

Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness. Can classroom observations identify practices that raise achievement? By Thomas J. Kane, Eric S. Taylor, (If some teachers are assigned particularly engaged or cohesive classrooms year after year, the results could still be biased; this approach, however, does eliminate bias due to year-to-year differences.

Evaluating Teachers: The Important Role of Value-Added. 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY he evaluation of teachers based on the contribution they make to the learning of their students, added, is an increasingly. The evaluation of teachers based on the contribution they make to the learning of their students, value-added, is an increasingly popular but controversial education reform policy.

We highlight. Evaluating Teachers with Classroom Observations - Lessons Learned in Four Districts 3 levels receive classroom observation scores that are higher on average than those received by teachers. Evaluating Teachers with Classroom Observations - Lessons Learned in Four Districts 3 levels receive classroom observation scores that are higher on average than those received by teachers.

Teacher Evaluation - NYC DOE | United Federation of Teachers